Liberate Tate strike again!
February 9 2015
Video: via You Tube
Liberate Tate - with whom AHN recently found itself in an uneasy alliance over the question of BP's sponsorship - has struck again; this time, £240,000 of fake 'Tate/BP money' was thrown theatrically into the rotunda at Tate Britain. Actually, it looks rather well done on the video. But must Liberate Tate insist on always wearing masks? And must we now call all arts protests, as is this one was, 'performances'?
Update - a reader writes:
I also agree with your comment is it necessary for Liberate Tate to wear masks? Frankly, to me it demonstrates a a lack of conviction. Are they drama students or those who look to bring a situation to public awareness. When you believe in a cause you show yourself and not hide behind a mask.
Another reader wonders:
I’ll bet that the fake Tate/BP money was printed using oil based inks…
Update II - another reader writes:
My American view is that the Tate should be encouraged to relieve BP of much more of its profits so long as I they don't come with artistic influence and a petrol station (unless it's by Hirst or his ilk).
Attempts to purchase standing are seen for what they are whether it's an oil company or a certain Swiss bank or an individual.
Ultimately we are known for our deeds and for our accomplishments.
